Hrasvaroman

THE LIVING ARCHIVE

About Hrasvaroman

Videha is the royal house associated with Mithila. Its origin is traced through Nimi, a son of Ikshvaku, and the extraordinary birth of Janaka-Mithi. It is related to the wider Ikshvaku family while retaining its own succession and its own household of Sita.

AT A GLANCE

Identity & Context

Identity: King
Form: Videha Royal House
Tradition: Puranic Royal Genealogy

Family & Relationships

ParentSuvarnaroman
Suvarnaroman is named as the parent of Hrasvaroman in this succession.
ChildJanaka
Hrasvaroman is named as the parent of Janaka in this succession.

IN THE TRADITION

Recorded Context

His Place in the Royal Family

Hrasvaroman follows Suvarnaroman as his son in the succession. Maharoman is the preceding grandfather’s generation. The line then passes to Janaka. These generations belong to the same royal succession. They connect an earlier household to the later members of its family, even where the account passes over a reign without recounting a separate adventure.

The Surrounding Royal Story

The founding story tells how sages produced Janaka-Mithi from Nimi’s preserved body after Nimi declined a return to bodily life. Much later, Siradhvaja discovered Sita in a furrow while preparing sacrificial ground. The kings listed between those figures connect the two households; the founder’s birth and Sita’s discovery are not adventures of every intervening ruler.

ROLE & ESSENCE

Attributes & Significance

This position helps trace Sita’s royal household back through the older Videha succession to Nimi’s branch of the Ikshvaku family. It makes the relationship between Mithila and the larger solar dynasty visible without merging their separate royal lines.

Role

Hrasvaroman is a king of the Videha royal house of Mithila, named in the Vishnu Purana as the son of Suvarnaroman and the father of Janaka.

TRADITION & MEANING

Traditions & Interpretations

Hrasvaroman is remembered chiefly through this royal genealogy. The surviving notice identifies his family position, but gives no separate account of his wars, marriages or personal weapons. His place in the dynasty is clearer than the details of his individual reign.